#Staruml abstract class how to#

To test out implemented Schematron rules I prepared the worst model I can as pictured below. Validating constraints for schema transformation profile - non multiple extendingĬlass must not extend more than one class

attribute must have defined multiplicityįirst point of the list looks as follow: ĭocument not conforms StarUML structure of version 1.class name should be longer than 5 chars (after dropping abstract prefix).abstract classes should have abstract prefix.Model will be verified on three levels - document conformance (if it is StarUML document), model quality (defined for model itself) and transformation profile constraints (schema in that case). Default implementation of the standard compiles tests into XSLT stylesheet and then executes against a document. Conditions are written in pluggable expression languages – XPath is default one. It is simple language that defines rules of assertions that are applicable in specific document context. There is nothing to invent – there is an ISO standard also known as Schematron. In this case literal and structural analysis of UML file is fairly simple owing to its XML format. Testing can be implemented as validation. Implementation dependant model generation corresponds to compilation.

#Staruml abstract class how to#

In one of my recent posts I presented how to transform StarUML model to XML Schema outside the tool. Nowadays successful building any bigger system is not possible without both. The former is achieved by automated compilation with testing and the latter by publishing the results.

Main benefits of Continuous Integration practice are improved quality and team communication.